Accidentally, in the road parallel to the river, a car hit a truck. The passengers in the car were a father and a daughter, and a passenger in the truck, the truck-driver. The daughter got affected violently in the brain. Eftsoon, the police came and asked the father what 's happened. The father said the truck-driver drove the car past in front of his car. The police gave an advice to the truck-driver that he must admit his fault. It would benefit him to do so, but he didn't follow the police's instruction. He was beginning to criticize and challenge the police as well as despise them. He says they don't have the authority to judge him. After that, he described his story and said he didn't do anything wrong. Suddenly, the father bemoaned severlely because of his daughter's death. The story had a big effect and began an argument between both of them. For a short time, the truck-driver showed hypocrisy when he said it wasn't my fault. Therefore, it is a cause of a quarrel, and it began worse. Immediately, he used a gun shooting the father until he died. So, it illustrated that the story is what occured because of on both sides. Finally, the end of the argument is both father and daughter died, even if they didn't something wrong. If the father could be alive, he would say if we know how to forgive and be responsible for things, there's no problems and chaos in the society.
